Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
I have often disputed on this forum, the ancestry of Moses Cleveland. However, I cannot resist commenting here. Look at the supposed ages you give in your posting.
Going backward Richard was 41 when Isaac was born. Thomas was anywhere between 9 and 38 when Richard was born. William was somewhere bewteen 74 and 97 when Thomas was born. John was 65 when William was born. (And now it gets real good). Robert was 115 when John was born. Uctred was 155 when Robert was born and Thorkil was 70 when Uctred was born.
Doesn't that sound a bit implausible? I know people assume this is the line, but in the least you're missing 6-10 generations and there's not a shred of proof for this line. I'm sorry to rain on your parade, but passing bad information, no matter how unintended, just irks me.
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/cleveland/messages/819.html | ||
 |
Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|