Re: Clayborn/Claiborne Va. as Early as 1676

Chat

Daily Search

My GenForum

Community Standards

Terms of Service

Jump to Forum

Home: Surnames: Clayborn Family Genealogy Forum

Re: Clayborn/Claiborne Va. as Early as 1676
Posted by: Mary Thompson	Date: March 27, 1999 at 10:39:19
In Reply to: Re: Clayborn/Claiborne Va. as Early as 1676 by Neil J. Leonard, Jr	of 235

Thanks Neil. This clears up the question.
Phillip would have had to have a son to carry
the Jackson name forward, apparently he did
not, so we can elimiate this possiblity, unless there is the possibility of other children not know of at this time.

Thank you so much for you help.
Mary

Followups:

Re: Clayborn/Claiborne Va. as Early as 1676 JUNE JOHNSON 2/24/03

Re: Clayborn/Claiborne Va. as Early as 1676 Gerald Preas 4/27/08

Re: Clayborn/Claiborne Va. as Early as 1676 Mary 2/24/03

Re: Clayborn/Claiborne Va. as Early as 1676 Gerald Preas 2/12/09

http://genforum.genealogy.com/clayborn/messages/19.html
Search this forum:	Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching
	Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum