Starting Sept. 30, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Chronister Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Proof for William M. Chronister
Posted by: Debra Blackard (ID *****5421) Date: August 02, 2006 at 12:09:21
In Reply to: Re: Proof for William Jackson Chronister by Randy Duvall of 599

I am working on a records comparison of the several William Chronisters in Pope Co. for your review. Some things became very obvious when I added some recently acquired information. As was clear in our previous exchanges, I became totally convinced that William Jackson Chronister was the son of Azariah, mostly because he appeared on the tax rolls as a minor at almost the same time of Azariah’s estate was admitted to probate in Johnson Co. However, the land doesn’t lie. I have some “new” data to add to the mix.

Randy and Cathy, I have come to agree with you that William M. is the son of Azariah, however much it defies logic when looking at his tax, census and land records. William J., who remains the most logical candidate, “IS NOT.” Mary Lou, our very strong circumstantial case cannot stand against land records that document the inheritance of land. Peggy, there is nothing wrong with our research techniques or our data. Looking at our proof, I think it is still very solid, but we stopped short of searching all the tax and land records available. When I was finally able to invest the time to do this, I found the solution to the identity problem for William M.’s father.

A big thank you to Pope Co. Historical Association leaders for listening to theories and helping me get to where I was going, even if it turned out to be different from where I thought. I had to re-evaluate in light of this new information obtained from Pope Co. deed and tax records. But we all know that re-assessing is a constant in research.

As yet, my case for the father of William J. remains circumstantial. However, with one more of the Williams eliminated from the pool, it should be easier.





Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/chronister/messages/491.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network