
| Posted By: | Judith Litsinger Burgett | |
| Email: | ![]() | |
| Subject: | FRUSTRATING SORT DATE PROBLEM | |
| Post Date: | October 04, 2006 at 08:40:30 | |
| Message URL: | http://genforum.genealogy.com/uft/messages/11186.html | |
| Forum: | Ultimate Family Tree Forum | |
| Forum URL: | http://genforum.genealogy.com/uft/ |
|
My UFT program was successfully transferred to Windows XP with the expertise of a paid computer person. Previously, I was able to use a sort date to arrange missing births in order. Under the birth category I would write “unknown,” and fabricate a sort date that placed the person correctly within the family unit. Even if a death date existed, no calculated age appeared. Now, however, if I know a death date and make up a birth sort date, UFT inserts an age at death into the record. If I don’t use a sort date, individuals with missing births incorrectly pop to the top of the sibling list. Does anyone know of a simple way to solve this problem? I’m good at word processing and Internet searches, but am totally inept at data-based and computer programming. Thank you. Judith A. Burgett |