Posted By:Thomas Kerwin
Email:
Subject:Re: Artemesia Olmstead
Post Date:July 06, 2012 at 11:14:22
Message URL:http://genforum.genealogy.com/ct/messages/15691.html
Forum:Connecticut Genealogy Forum
Forum URL:http://genforum.genealogy.com/ct/

I’m not related to any member of this family.


Connecticut, Deaths and Burials Index, 1650-1934
Name: Artemsia Olmstead Middlebrook
Death Date: 1864
Death Place: Connecticut
Burial Place: Connecticut
Gender: Female
Marital Status: Married
Spouse: Samuel

1860 -
Name: Samuel Middlebrook
Age in 1860: 36
Birth Year: abt 1824
Birthplace: Connecticut
Home in 1860: Wilton, Fairfield, Connecticut
Gender: Male
Post Office: Wilton

Samuel Middlebrook 36, CT - farmer
Artimisa Middlebrook 25, MASS [1835]
Charles O Middlebrook 8, CT
Samuel F Middlebrook 6, CT
Minnie B Middlebrook 2, CT
Charles Middlebrook 36, CT - watchmaker


You wrote - "Artemesia Olmstead (sometimes spelled Olmsted)". Where are there examples of her name being spelled that way?????????? She only appears on the 1850 and 1860 census.


NOTE -
1850, 1860 & 1870 census records do not show family relationships, marital status or parental birthplaces.

Step children are not enumerated as “step” children
Adopted children are not enumerated as “adopted”
Grand children are not enumerated as “grand children”
Orphaned children were not enumerated as "orphan"

1850 is the 1st census that shows all family members