Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
The 1900 census Santa Barbara County California
has her birth info as May 1858.
She had been married 20 years at time of census, however, she must have married Joseph after June 1 1880 as she is not with him in that census.
This may be her..this was as close to her first name as came up...I looked at the actual image and it appears to be DINA.
1880 United States Federal Census
Name: Dinah Garcia
Home in 1880: Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
Age: 21
Estimated birth year: abt 1859
Birthplace: California
Relation to head-of-household: Niece
Father's birthplace: California
Mother's birthplace: California
Occupation: At Home
Marital Status: Single
Race: White
Gender: Female
Household Members: Name Age
Miguel Garcia 52
Monica Garcia 48
Eduarda Arrellanes 17 nephew
Dinah Garcia 21 neice
In using the lead of her uncle's name and the county of Santa Barbara..I searched further...unfortunately 1870 census fail to establish relationship among household members...
1870
Township 2, Santa Barbara, California
these 2 are in the same household
Diana Garcia abt 1859 California White Female
Dolores Garcia abt 1822 California White Male
LIVING NEXT DOOR(SEE 1880 CENSUS)
Miguel Garcia abt 1830 California White Male
Monica A Garcia abt 1832 California White Female
1860 AGAIN NO RELATIONSHIP SHOWN.
Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
Miguel Garcia 31
Monica Garcia 27
Jesus Garcia 6
SAME PAGE DIFFERENT HOUSEHOLD
Dolores Garcia 38 MALE
Maria Garcia 25
Digra Garcia 6.12
THERE ARE MORE GARCIA'S LIVING NEXT DOOR ON EITHER SIDE OF DELORES AND MARIA.
THE FIRST NAME VARIATIONS ARE NOT UNUSUAL AND BIRTHDATES CAN BE OFF -+ A YEAR {OR EVEN MORE SOMETIMES...NO PARTICULAR REASON, HUMAN ERROR USUALLY}.
I AM NOT RELATED.
I HOPE THIS HELPED.
REGARDS,
CONNIE
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/ca/santabarbara/messages/219.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|