Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Binkley Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Binkley not Brinkley
Posted by: Judy Derry Mahoney (ID *****8076) Date: March 09, 2008 at 15:41:24
In Reply to: Re: Elizabeth Brinkley b 1828, Clermont Co., OH by Sue Binckley Allen of 678

Thanks, Sue! Typo in my original posting - it should be Binkley. Clermont Co., OH, Marriage Record transcript : William Derry (23) & Elizabeth Binkley (21) April 3, 1849. (haven't seen original entry)

After working with a Derrough and a Binkley researchers, we feel confident the groom was William Derrough, not Derry. (1) Wm. & Elizabeth Derrough 1850 census, Goshen Twp., Clermont Co. w/dau., Eliza A. 3/12. (not found in any other census) At this time there were Derroughs living in Clermont Co. but, the Derrough researcher has not been able to connect Wm. to her line. (2) 1878 Obit for Susannah Binkley, 2nd wife of Jacob Binkley, lists a dau. Mrs. Elizabeth Derrough. (3) Wm. Derrough, re:marriage record, was 23 = b abt.1826. The only adult married male Derry in the area in 1826 was John Derry who had a son named Wm. b abt. 1817. [Wm.Derry married Mary Murphy in 1838, Brown Co., OH]

-DNA proven: Derry line in Brown Co. was not related to the Derrys in Loudon Co., VA.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/binkley/messages/675.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network