Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
"Aaron to Samuel & Sarah Pinney, to Samuel and Martha Chapman and finally to Simon and Alice Young" would be a likely line of ancestry, however, I do not know that for certain. As Samuel Beman and Sarah Pinney were a couple who were in Simsbury at the time that Aaron would have been born, they would have to be the first suspects. However, it still needs proof. I know of four children for Samuel and Sarah, those being Samuel (b.1733) m.Sarah Smith; Thomas (b.1734) m. Lydia Roberts; Simon (b.1736); and Sarah (d.1740). Their mother Sarah Pinney was born in 1707, and was therefore only 29 years old in 1736. As she was still living in 1783 (and her husband was living in 1762), she most certainly had other children than these four, and as Aaron was born before 1751, he may certainly have been one of them. So right now you can call Aaron a probable son (based on the right time frame and being in the right place) but more evidence is needed to declare him a definite son. As there is apparently no birth record for him, that may have to come from a will or estate settlement for either Samuel or Sara (Pinney) Beman, or possibly from a brother or sister of Aaron's who may have mentioned Aaron, or, once again, through clues from land transactions between father and son, or siblings.
In that deed you mentioned, Thomas Sr. would be the son of Samuel and Sarah (Pinney) Beman, while Thomas Jr, Daniel, and Reuben are all his sons.
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:No followups yet |
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/beeman/messages/629.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|