Re: Mercer Beeson -
-
In reply to:
Re: Mercer Beeson -
William Beason 12/05/11
I am sorry that you feel that way. My attitude is not bad but the first reply, I asked you whether we had corresponded before and the names of your books so that you would not have to repeat looking up something that you've already looked up.
I checked the e-mail address of the previous correspondence and it was youra. You replied that you didn't know and did not tell me the names of the books.
I told you that I've checked all published Beason/Beeson genealogy books but you ignored this or didn't believe me so there is no need to check them again but I tried to be polite and continued to reply.
You asked for more information on my Mercer Beason, his wives, and known relationships and I gave it to you.You apparently didn't read it carefully because you send back replies that were not the information that I sent.
I am not going to argue with anyone online nor continue a discussion when my messages and documented information was not accurately read. I do not want hard feelings between us and am sorry there was some sort of misunderstanding.
More Replies:
-
Re: Mercer Beeson -
William Beason 12/06/11
-
Re: Mercer Beeson -
Lorraine LeBeau 2/27/12
-
Re: Mercer Beeson -
William Beason 2/28/12
-
Re: Mercer Beeson -
-
Re: Mercer Beeson -
Deborah Carder 12/06/11
-
Re: Mercer Beeson -