Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
-
In reply to:
BATEMAN geneology
3/23/98
Should have referenced NC and TN as well as the
timeline in the subject line.Sorry if this
missled anyone.
More Replies:
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
12/07/98
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
Connie Faulk 12/26/98
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
11/14/99
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
mildred garner 7/15/05
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
6/06/01
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
Robert McAlear 7/03/01
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
7/03/01
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
Robert McAlear 7/03/01
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
6/20/01
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
Connie Faulk 6/07/01
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)
12/27/98
-
Re: BATEMAN geneology/NC>TN (1804-present)