Big changes have come to Genealogy.com — all content is now read-only, and member subscriptions and the Shop have been discontinued.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Regional: Countries: Australia Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Edith Louisa Maude Kinley nee Langman
Posted by: Barbara Lawrance (ID *****2356) Date: March 15, 2013 at 21:28:19
In Reply to: Re: Edith Louisa Maude Kinley nee Langman by Tania Dennis of 82839

Dear Tania,

Thank you very much for all the research you have done, yes I made a spelling mistake Edith's name is Kingley. I find it interesting Edith and John didn't marry until 1914, I know she was in her twenties when she eloped with John. As I cannot find any children other than Lawrance dying in 1915 he must have been old enough to have children as I had slight contact with a descendant.
I have a snip of a photo with Edith and her son Arthur Hill?
born 1902-1980 interesting the different surname, the photo definitely states son.
My apologies for not replying sooner but I was unable to access the site for three days also waiting for notification of replies, obviously Genforum doesn't do that any more.

It is also interesting Edith is buried in Bendigo as she was in Queensland the year of her death.

Many thanks,
Barbara


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/australia/messages/82044.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network