Yes Jean, we have checked the Colonial Families database. There are a huge number of SMITH entries (as would be expected), and the primitive search/ordering facilities available there provide little leverage.
Thomas appears in at least 2 entries (338931 and 349740), but this provides no new insight.
Notify Administrator about this message?
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|