Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Michelle, Sorry I have confused you
George de la Montague had children with Jeannie Anna SHOEST
which I have listed in the previous message
Adelaide Elizabeth & her two siblings (there were 3 children born to this couple)
George (the father) could have been born anywhere but he came from a british port when he came to australia
This only means where the ship came from not the person
Adelaide and George did not have children together - Adelaide was his daughter
Adelaides birth was listed under SHOEST and de la Montague which suggests that it was a birth to her mother when unmarried. If they were married it would be listed under the fathers surname only
It is crossreferenced in the index to link them to each other by a letter R following the registration number
It means that her birth was listed under both names
I cannot find any further info on this family in victoria after these births so possibly they went somewhere else and as you know Adelaide married in Paris
Hope this clarifies it but let me know if you have any further queries
Not sure what you mean by "who is Jean" If you mean Jeannie she is Adelaides mother and if you mean Jean that is my name at the bottom of the posting Jean
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/australia/messages/63591.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|