Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA.

Chat

Daily Search

My GenForum

Community Standards

Terms of Service

Jump to Forum

Home: Surnames: Annable Family Genealogy Forum

Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA.
Posted by: heather	Date: May 14, 2001 at 21:03:37
In Reply to: Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. by Sara Davie Holt	of 185

With the records that seem to exist from so long ago maybe we will never know. Anthony seems to have had a sister Alice born in England in 1604, and possibly a brother John (several references to a John Annable in Massachusetts, but no connection as of yet. So perhaps not too far fetched that he would have another sister Hannah. Happy hunting to us all! Heather

Followups:

Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kathy Bumpus Schullman 7/03/01

http://genforum.genealogy.com/annable/messages/79.html
Search this forum:	Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching
	Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum