Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA.

Chat

Daily Search

My GenForum

Community Standards

Terms of Service

Jump to Forum

Home: Surnames: Annable Family Genealogy Forum

Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA.
Posted by: Kristen Johnson Ingram	Date: April 30, 2001 at 23:36:22
In Reply to: Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. by Bill Baxter	of 185

Hannah is my 10ggrandmother. My records say she was born betw. 1602 and 1607, in Duxbury ENGLAND. (I think this is another case of Massachusetts places, such as Essex, Duxbury, Salem, Plymouth and Weymouth, being settled by people from those same areas in England.

I don't have a birth date for her father---the reigning Internet dates of 1599-1600 aren't likely if HAnnah was born so early in the century. I think maybe Thomas Bumpasse as Edouard's father is more credible than John, w. Jane Momford as his mother.

I trace my ancestry to Hannah and Edouard through their son John, m. Sarah Hunter of Scituate, Plymouth, MA, and her granddaughter, Mary Bumpass, who married Isaac Benson. It's fun to correspond with my ninth cousins, however many times removed.

Followups:

Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Sara Davie Holt 5/01/01
- Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kristen Ingram 5/01/01
  - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Bill Baxter 5/02/01
    - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kristen Ingram 5/02/01
  - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Sara Davie Holt 5/01/01
    - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. heather 5/14/01
      - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Sara Davie Holt 5/14/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. heather 5/14/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kathy Bumpus Schullman 7/03/01

http://genforum.genealogy.com/annable/messages/69.html
Search this forum:	Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching
	Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum