Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA.

Chat

Daily Search

My GenForum

Community Standards

Terms of Service

Jump to Forum

Home: Surnames: Annable Family Genealogy Forum

Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA.
Posted by: Bill Baxter	Date: April 10, 2001 at 16:20:59
In Reply to: Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. by Sara Davie Holt	of 185

Hello,

Hannah was also my GGGGGGGGG?gmother. The I too have found many conflicting mentions on her. However, she could not have been born in 1602 in Duxbury. They didn't the Mayflower didn't last until 1620.

The arrival of 1629 sounds likely. Can't find much before they arrived.

Thanks,
Bill
Montgomery,NY

Followups:

Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Sara Davie Holt 4/10/01
- Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Bill Baxter 4/11/01
  - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kristen Johnson Ingram 4/30/01
    - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Sara Davie Holt 5/01/01
      - Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kristen Ingram 5/01/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Bill Baxter 5/02/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kristen Ingram 5/02/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Sara Davie Holt 5/01/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. heather 5/14/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Sara Davie Holt 5/14/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. heather 5/14/01
        
        Re: HANNAH ANNABLE Bompasse = 1600s-MA. Kathy Bumpus Schullman 7/03/01

http://genforum.genealogy.com/annable/messages/59.html
Search this forum:	Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching
	Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum