Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Here are some other bits to add to your list.... I did not have Elizabeth's name as Bugge but as Eveson - however, it would fit in that she was a widow.
1. Elizabeth md. 24 Jun 1606 to William WATTS
28 Feb 1613 to John HAYWARD
2. John md. about 1621 to Elizabeth EDOLPH
The marriage was 23 December 1616. John was the son and heir, was an MP, a lawyer and fathered some 20 children.
3. Catherina md. 21 Jan 1609 to John PEMBERTON
This is the marriage which connects this Angell family to Roger Williams - John's Aunt was Rogers mother
4. Jacob
This is probably James - died April 1638 who married Anne Elliott 2 February 1623/24
5. Anne
She died 13 December 1613. She married Simon Wood 4 September 1609
6. Joyce md. to Francis GRENNES
The name of the husband is variously spelt Greenose/Greenowes (A cousin Angell married Francis' brother). They were married 6 December 1608,
7. Maria
Or Mary - Married John Claypole 8 June 1622. Their eldest son, John, married Oliver Cromwell's daughter Helen and a number of their other offspring were to emigrate to the Americas, see the genforum group for Claypool.
8. Elionora
or Helen married Graveley Norton 30 January 1626/27 the older brother of Benjamin who married her sister Bridget.
9. Bridget
married Benjamin Norton
10. Martha
Married William Lucy 12 February 1628/29 who later became Bishop of St. Davids in Wales. William's father, Sir Thomas of Charlecote was said to have prosecuted Shakespeare for poaching his deer.
11. Richard
12. William
I have nothing on these guys I presume they did not survive to adulthood - there is no mention of them in their father's will or in the various visitations I have seen.
13. Robert
Robert 1607-1684 is thought to have ended up in Dorset - however there are records of court cases in the later 18th century which indicate that Dorset Registers were forged to prove descent from William Angell.
14. William again
Again I have not seen a reference to this William - but it is logical that there would have been boys named for their father.
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/angell/messages/118.html | ||
 |
Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|