Starting Sept. 5, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Regional: U.S. States: Alabama Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Burnley
Posted by: phyl g (ID *****0891) Date: September 02, 2013 at 13:41:45
In Reply to: Burnley by Kim Richardson of 39786

Did you possibly make a typo somewhere along the way.
Emily would've been 50 in 1886; 67 when last ch born. These ch can't be hers.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/al/messages/39546.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network